Criminal Defense, Downward Departure, Legal Blog, Recent News

Downward Departure and the Right to Jury Trial

In a good case out of the 5th DCA published last week, the appellate court reiterated the constitutional right to a trial by jury.

In the case (Little v. State), the defendant elected to go to trial and was ultimately found guilty. During the sentencing phase, the trial judge made it clear that he would not even consider a downward departure argument because it was his policy that when a jury finds a defendant guilty, he will not downward depart. The appellate court held that the judge’s policy was a violation of due process, reversed the sentence, and ordered that a resentencing be held before a different judge to make the determination as to whether a downward departure sentence is appropriate

For those unfamiliar with downward departure, Florida Statute 921.0026 allows the court to downward depart from the lowest permissible sentence calculated by the felony point system. There are a list of mitigating circumstances found within the statute that the sentencing judge may consider in determining whether to downward depart, such as:

  • the defendant was a relatively minor participant in the crime;
  • the defendant was too young, or the capacity of the defendant to appreciate his conduct and the law was impaired by something other than voluntary intoxication;
  • the defendant requires specialized treatment for a mental disorder that is unrelated to substance abuse or addiction or for a physical disability, and is amenable to treatment;
  • the defendant acted under extreme duress;
  • the defendant cooperated with the state;
  • the offense was committed in an unsophisticated manner and was an isolated incident for which the defendant has shown remorse; or
  • the defendant should be sentenced as a youthful offender.

The full list can be found under Florida Statute 921.0026(2).

 

In the Little case, the trial court essentially punished the defendant for electing to exercise his constitutional right to a trial by jury, because it does not want to “disrespect” the jury. That is contrary to law, and the appellate court found that the judge committed fundamental error requiring reversal.

The right to trial by jury is a constitutional right stemming from the presumption that every person is innocent until proven guilty, and a defendant should not be punished for exercising his or her constitutional right.

Anyone who is facing criminal charges in Palm Beach County, Florida should contact a Palm Beach criminal defense attorney.

 

Casey Reiter is an associate attorney at Stuart R. Manoff & Associates, P.A. in West Palm Beach, Florida, practicing in the areas of Criminal Defense and Family law.

Breathalyzer, Criminal Defense, DUI, Legal Blog

DUI Defense

DUI charges that involve a breathalyzer result over the legal limit often seem difficult, if not impossible, to beat. However, an experienced DUI defense attorney will know that there are certain things to look for that could possible lead to the suppression of the test. If the breathalyzer is suppressed, it is often much more difficult for the State to go forward with their charges.

One possible defense is that the “20 minute observation period” was not properly followed. What is the 20 Minute Observation Period? In a Florida DUI case, when a person is requested to provide a breath sample using the breath machine called the Intoxilyzer 8000, there are certain rules that the police officers must follow in order for the breath sample to be valid. One of the requirements is what is known as a 20 Minute Observation Period. For a period of 20 minutes, the breath test operator must continuously observe the person giving the breath sample. This observation period is mandated by Rule 11B-8.007(3) of the Florida Administrative Code in order to ensure that person giving the breath sample has not taken anything by mouth, has not regurgitated for at least 20 minutes before administering a breath test, and to allow for any alcohol remaining in the mouth to disappear. Without waiting for 20 minutes, the breath test may be invalid due to alcohol in the mouth, instead of the breath, showing up on the test.

There was recently a case in Florida where the breath test operator only observed the defendant for 17 minutes instead of the full 20 minutes. The defense filed a motion to suppress the results, arguing that 17 minutes was not sufficient to be in strict compliance with the requirements – and the trial court agreed.

There have been many cases similar to that – including one where the Defendant was observed for 18 minutes and 23 seconds – where the court threw out the results.

A knowledgeable criminal defense attorney will know how to read the breath results and what to look for to see whether the test was in compliance or not. A test that was not administered in accordance with the rules may be deemed inadmissible.

Anyone who is facing DUI charges in Florida, including Palm Beach County, should contact a criminal defense attorney experienced in Driving Under the Influence charges to review the case for any possible defenses.

Casey Reiter is an associate attorney at Stuart R. Manoff & Associates, P.A. in West Palm Beach, Florida, practicing in the areas of Criminal Defense and Marital Law.

Criminal Defense, DUI, Legal Blog, Recent News

Tailgate Parties

Attorney Casey Reiter was recently quoted in an article appearing on Avvo’s Nakedlaw Blog regarding “Why Tailgate Parties are Legal, Unless You Have Pot.” The full article can be found HERE.

In the article, Attorney Reiter explains that “tailgate parties” (events where sports fans gather in parking lots prior to the event to eat, drink, and have a good time) are not unlawful events, even though they may ultimately result in drinking and driving.

Casey Reiter briefly explains in the Nakedlaw Article that drinking and driving, in and of itself, is not against the law in Florida.

“A person who drives home after one beer is not necessarily committing a DUI,” she says. “A person cannot drink alcohol to the extent that his or her ability is impaired and then drive a vehicle.”

Having a beer and then driving is not illegal as long as a person’s normal faculties – the ability to walk, talk, see, and hear – are not impaired by one beer, and as long as the person’s blood alcohol content is under the legal limit of .08 (or .02 for minors). If it was illegal for a person to have a sip of alcohol (or even more) and then get behind the wheel, restaurants that serve alcohol would likely not be allowed to have parking lots. That is simply not the case.

Additionally, just because someone is at a tailgating party doesn’t necessarily mean that they are drinking and driving. A person can attend a tailgate and not drink, and a person can drink at a tailgate and not be driving. Further, a person can attend a tailgate, drink, go watch the event, sober up, and drive home without having committed any crime.

Finally, it is important to note that if a municipality has an ordinance banning drinking in public, police can ticket and/or arrest anyone who is openly drinking alcohol on public property, such as sidewalks, public parks, streets, etc. Often, places where tailgating is prevalent, such as sporting arenas or even private driveways, are not public and therefore are not in violation.

Of course, this is not to suggest that it is advisable for a person to drink alcohol and then get behind the wheel. Bring a sober driver with you or take a cab if you may have overindulged. As always, anyone who is facing a DUI charge in Florida should contact a Florida Criminal Defense attorney.

Casey Reiter is an associate attorney at Stuart R. Manoff & Associates, P.A. in West Palm Beach, Florida, practicing in the areas of Criminal Defense and Marital Law.
Criminal Defense, Legal Blog, Recent News

As Quoted in US News & World Report

Attorney Casey Reiter was recently quoted in an article by US News & World Report regarding the “Real Cost of a Traffic Ticket.”

In the article, Attorney Reiter explains that there may be applicable technicalities to having a traffic ticket dismissed or fines reduced. While drivers can elect to attend traffic court on their own, Ms. Reiter states that in Florida, “Many people find that the convenience of having a lawyer go to traffic court on their behalf is well worth the 80 or so dollars.” However, it is important to remember that while many drivers may choose to elect traffic school to avoid points on their licenses rather than hire a traffic ticket attorney, in Florida, traffic school may only be elected once per 12 months and only five times in a lifetime.

To read the full article, CLICK HERE

Casey Reiter is an associate attorney at Stuart R. Manoff & Associates, P.A. in West Palm Beach, Florida, practicing in the areas of Criminal Defense and Marital Law.